|
The
State of Spam
Spam
has become more than just an annoying piece
of mail selling products or offering low-interest
mortgages. It has evolved into a virus-carrying
medium used to hijack computers to distribute
more spam, an instrument of spurious appeals
for cash, leading unsuspecting users to fraudulent
websites with the sole purpose of stealing credit
card and other financial information.
Such
is the state of spam today that it has been
dubbed as the curse of the information age.
It has reached such alarming proportions that
governments across the globe are now frantically
trying to find ways to stem its tide. The European
Union is urging its member states to ban spam
while legislation is being debated in the US
Senate to implement other measures - including
a national ‘do-not-spam’ list.
Needless
to say, spam has become a hot issue in the political
arena. Meanwhile, spamming is increasingly becoming
a very costly nuisance for companies and individuals.
Teenager
Barred From Sending E-Mail Spam
The
Federal Trade Commission has settled a civil
action against a 17-year-old California boy
who created a fake America Online Web site to
collect credit card and other personal financial
information from unwitting consumers. He was
barred from sending out spam e-mails and will
be forced to give up about $3500 in profits
from his venture, which ran from July to December
2002. A federal court in central California
must formally approve the settlement.
The
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said that the
complaint against the unnamed teenager is the
agency's first law enforcement action against
identity theft through a growing online scam
called "phishing."
"Phishing
is a two-time scam," FTC Chairman Timothy
J. Muris said in a statement. "Phishers
first steal a company's identity and then use
it to victimize consumers by stealing their
credit identities."
Source:
Los Angeles Times, IDG News Service
Back to top
Do-Not-Spam
List Finds Favor as Senate Vote Nears
Three out of four Americans
favor a "do not spam" registry to
keep unwanted e-mail at bay, according to a
recent survey as the U.S. Senate prepared to
vote on the issue before its August break.
Patterned
after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)'s popular
"do not call" registry of households
that do not wish to hear from telemarketers,
the list would theoretically allow Internet
users to make their inboxes off-limits to the
online marketers whose unsolicited offers now
make up nearly half of all e-mail traffic.
The
registry has found an advocate in Democratic
Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, who hopes
to include a do-not-spam proposal in an anti-spam
bill that could come up for a vote in the Senate
this month.
In
testimony before Congress, the FTC has been
lukewarm to the idea. Critics say the list would
be widely ignored by spammers and would divert
resources better spent tracking down those who
peddle dubious get-rich-quick schemes.
Source:
Reuters
Spam
Filings Flood Court
Advocates
of Utah's anti-spam law, bloodied in the opening
round of their fight against unsolicited e-mail,
have roared back into the courtroom arena.
Third
District Judge Denise Lindberg, who dismissed
Salt Lake City attorney Denver Snuffer's proposed
class-action lawsuit against Sprint Communications
four months ago, now faces a backlog of about
1,200 new complaints against scores of alleged
spammers.
The
flood of lawsuits, brought over the past year
by Snuffer and Jesse Riddle, a Draper lawyer,
is the first of many waves of such filings Lindberg's
Sandy court can likely expect.
The
suits are being filed under Utah's 14-month-old
Unsolicited E-Mail Act, which provides for fines
of $10 per unwanted e-mail up to a maximum of
$25,000 per day. If the spate of new complaints
is certified as a class action, potential damages
could easily be in the multiple millions of
dollars.
Source: The Salt Lake Tribune
Back to top
EU Takes
Action on Growing E-mail spam
The
European Commission, the executive arm of the
15-member European Union (EU), said in a statement,
that a global effort is needed to fight the
curse of spam, the junk e-mail that clogs up
computer systems everywhere.
EU
Commissioner, Erkki Liikanen, urged member states
to apply a new law on spam, which will come
into force from October. Under this new law,
e-mail marketing will only be allowed with prior
consent from the recipient.
Liikanen quoted industry figures showing around
48 percent of global e-mail traffic was spam
and time wasted in clearing it out of inboxes
cost firms $2.8 billion in productivity. Most
of the nuisance mails were selling products,
including financial services, 24 percent was
pornography-related while six percent was fraud
letters, such as a now well-known get-rich-quick
scheme of mails purporting to be from Nigeria.
Source:
Reuters
Germany
Moves to Crack Down on Spam E-mail
The German government is moving
to crack down on unwanted commercial e-mail
known as "spam" and will submit an
anti-spam bill to parliament later this year,
Consumer Protection Minister Renate Kuenast
confirmed.
According
to Kuenast, the bill would make it an offence
for spam e-mails to be sent to people without
their prior consent and allow the authorities
to take any profits made illegally by the practice.
Source:
AFP
Back to top
Australian
Spam Gets the Chop
The
Australian federal government intends to introduce
legislation later this year that will ban unsolicited
commercial e-mail, the minister for communications
and information technology, senator Richard
Alston announced recently.
The
legislation is in response to a report by the
National Office for the Information Economy,
released in April this year, which advocated
a multi-layered approach to Spam prevention.
The
government stressed its commitment not to harm
legitimate e-mail direct marketing as long as
it was "in line with the requirements of
the Privacy Act".
However, the Australian Direct Marketing Association
(ADMA) is concerned that the legislation may
adversely affect many local small and medium-sized
businesses that use e-mail as a legitimate marketing
tool.
The
legislation would include a 120-day 'sunrise
period' after it was enacted to allow businesses
to ensure their practices were in line with
its requirements.
Source:
ZDNet Australia
Calls
for Action to Ban Spam
SINGAPORE - Regulators in Singapore
are reviewing a list of anti-spam measures while
an overwhelming number of consumers in the United
States favor legally banning spam or limiting
it by law.
The
Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) here is
keeping a close watch on international developments
in the arena, said The Business Times. It cited
two surveys revealing 80 per cent of US consumers
polled want spam to be banned or limited by
law. About 60 per cent favor charging spammers
in court under criminal prosecution laws.
Source: Borneo Bulletin
Back to top
UPS
Sends Legal Message to Spammers
United
Parcel Service of America is tackling computer
spam with a federal suit that seeks more than
$1 million in damages from unnamed spammers.
In
June, the Atlanta-based parcel delivery service
sued individuals identified only as John Does
1-10, seeking an injunction that would bar them
from transmitting e-mail messages that either
purport to originate from UPS or use its trademark.
According
to the suit, the spammers began sending thousands
of unsolicited advertisements to UPS customers
in March. The e-mails contained headers that
made them appear to have originated from UPS
or its employees, the suit claims.
The e-mails prompted hundreds of customer complaints
"under the mistaken belief that the employees
were responsible for sending spam e-mails,"
according to the suit.
Source:
Law.com
Spam
Annoyance Leveling Off
While Internet
users are broadly in favor of legislation outlawing
"mass spamming," more people are accepting
spam as an everyday hassle, according to a new
Harris Poll report.
In
the last six months, support for legislation
outlawing spam has gone up five percentage points,
from 74 percent in December 2002, to 79 percent
in May 2003.
On the other hand, the number of people who
said that spam was 'very annoying' dropped significantly
from last year. In 2003, 64 percent used that
phrase to describe spam, a dramatic decline
from the 80 percent in 2002.
On
average, respondents said about 40 percent of
the e-mails they receive per day are spam. Pornography
remains the biggest annoyance, followed by mortgage
and loan offers and pharmaceuticals. Interestingly,
spam in some categories is not rated as that
annoying. Fewer than half of respondents said
spam for software and computer hardware annoyed
them.
Source:
Cyberatlas, TechWeb News
Back to top
 |
Opinions From Inspector Mails
| Inspector Mails is the AI entity for Bigfoot's
Anti-spam
Solution. He will be
giving regular updates on his
opinions on current anti-spam
trends. |
|
Spam
- The Result of Irresponsible E-mail Use
E-mail
is a powerful and invaluable tool for business
and for personal communication. Recent industry
studies have shown that its use will become
more deeply entrenched in the coming years.
The
threat to e-mail, spam, which accompanied the
maturity of this medium, has also grown dramatically.
It is now the number one problem of e-mail users
everywhere and is getting worse.
Spam
is basically the result of the irresponsible
use of e-mail. People started abusing it when
they discovered that they could send thousands
of messages with the same effort and expense
it takes to send one. The staggering costs associated
with e-mail abuse are real. They have been documented
and quantified.
Varied
approaches to controlling spam have been proposed
and implemented. Education and legal measures
are just some of them. However, for a solution
to be truly effective, it has to be as dynamic
as spam. The Bigfoot
Anti-spam Solution is a very potent weapon
against spam since it is able to respond rapidly
to changes and new developments. With Bigfoot
Anti-spam, e-mail users can again have full
control over what they receive in their inboxes.
Back to top
PORN
Spam
It
would be interesting to know some statistics
about how much spam is porn- related.
My guess is that it will be a significant
percentage.
|
| Phil |
|
You guessed it right. The latest Harris
poll shows that pornography is the biggest
annoyance while other industry figures
place it at 24% of total spam. Reference
to these statistics can be found in
the following articles in this issue:
“EU Takes Action on Growing E-mail
spam” and “spam Annoyance
Leveling Off”.
|
SPOOFING I
receive roughly 15 spams per day that
have a full name in the TO: line and
often use names similar to the people
I e-mail on a daily basis. There is
no rhyme or reason to the subject, so
my custom filters are virtually useless. |
Betsy |
What you have described is
known as ”spoofing”. It’s
the process of changing the name in an
e-mail so that it looks like the e-mail
came from somewhere or someone else. This
is one technique used by spammers to avoid
filters and is also the reason why your
filters, which are based on past spam,
will generally be ineffective. For more
information on spoofing, please refer
to the OPINION section of the April 2003
issue of the ASMR. |
ANTI-spam COSTS
I
am really interested in getting all
this junk away from my PC. It should
be against the law for any person/company
to send this rubbish through the airwaves;
some times it is upsetting to people
like me and others. The price of anti-spam
should come out of the account of
the people who send it and then maybe
they will stop sending this garbage
to us all. In the meantime we have
to stump up the price and it is dear
enough to buy items for the PCs with
out having to pay for a garbage remover.
|
Ella |
A lot of people share the same sentiment
about spam. Fortunately, technology companies,
governments, and various groups are now
working on solutions that hopefully will
put a stop to spam and its perpetrators.
You might find the article “Anti-spam
Research Group Plans To Set New Internet
Standards” published in the June
2003 issue particularly interesting. They
are looking at the possibility of mandatory
micro fines for unsolicited
e-mails, which is aimed at transferring
the cost of mail transmission from the
user to the spammer. |
We appreciate all of the comments and overwhelming
response we have received to the Anti-spam newsletter
and we will be addressing your concerns in the
next issue. You may send any comments regarding
the newsletter to antispam.review@bigfoot.com.
As we do reprint some of the comments of subscribers,
if you prefer that your email address be withheld,
simply advise Bigfoot and provide us a first name,
city and state as an alternative.
Back to top
 |
The following message was sent to you as
a subscriber of Bigfoot.com. We will continue
to bring you valuable offers on the products
and services that interest you most. If
you wish to unsubscribe, click
here. |
|