August 2003 Vol. 1 No. 7   


The State of Spam

Spam has become more than just an annoying piece of mail selling products or offering low-interest mortgages. It has evolved into a virus-carrying medium used to hijack computers to distribute more spam, an instrument of spurious appeals for cash, leading unsuspecting users to fraudulent websites with the sole purpose of stealing credit card and other financial information.

Such is the state of spam today that it has been dubbed as the curse of the information age. It has reached such alarming proportions that governments across the globe are now frantically trying to find ways to stem its tide. The European Union is urging its member states to ban spam while legislation is being debated in the US Senate to implement other measures - including a national ‘do-not-spam’ list.

Needless to say, spam has become a hot issue in the political arena. Meanwhile, spamming is increasingly becoming a very costly nuisance for companies and individuals.


Contents

 Special Feature
    Teenager Barred From Sending E-Mail Spam
United States of America
    
Do-Not-Spam List Finds Favor as Senate Vote Nears
   
Spam Filings Flood Court
Europe
    EU Takes Action on Growing E-mail spam
    Germany Moves to Crack Down on Spam E-mail
 Asia - Pacific
    Australian Spam Gets the Chop
    Calls for Action to Ban Spam
International News
    UPS Sends Legal Message to spammers
    Spam Annoyance Leveling Off
Opinion
  
Spam - The Result of Irresponsible E-mail Use
Letters To The Editor

Special Feature

Teenager Barred From Sending E-Mail Spam

The Federal Trade Commission has settled a civil action against a 17-year-old California boy who created a fake America Online Web site to collect credit card and other personal financial information from unwitting consumers. He was barred from sending out spam e-mails and will be forced to give up about $3500 in profits from his venture, which ran from July to December 2002. A federal court in central California must formally approve the settlement.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said that the complaint against the unnamed teenager is the agency's first law enforcement action against identity theft through a growing online scam called "phishing."

"Phishing is a two-time scam," FTC Chairman Timothy J. Muris said in a statement. "Phishers first steal a company's identity and then use it to victimize consumers by stealing their credit identities."

Source: Los Angeles Times, IDG News Service

Back to top

United States of America

Do-Not-Spam List Finds Favor as Senate Vote Nears

Three out of four Americans favor a "do not spam" registry to keep unwanted e-mail at bay, according to a recent survey as the U.S. Senate prepared to vote on the issue before its August break.

Patterned after the Federal Trade Commission (FTC)'s popular "do not call" registry of households that do not wish to hear from telemarketers, the list would theoretically allow Internet users to make their inboxes off-limits to the online marketers whose unsolicited offers now make up nearly half of all e-mail traffic.

The registry has found an advocate in Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer of New York, who hopes to include a do-not-spam proposal in an anti-spam bill that could come up for a vote in the Senate this month.

In testimony before Congress, the FTC has been lukewarm to the idea. Critics say the list would be widely ignored by spammers and would divert resources better spent tracking down those who peddle dubious get-rich-quick schemes.

Source: Reuters

Spam Filings Flood Court

Advocates of Utah's anti-spam law, bloodied in the opening round of their fight against unsolicited e-mail, have roared back into the courtroom arena.

Third District Judge Denise Lindberg, who dismissed Salt Lake City attorney Denver Snuffer's proposed class-action lawsuit against Sprint Communications four months ago, now faces a backlog of about 1,200 new complaints against scores of alleged spammers.

The flood of lawsuits, brought over the past year by Snuffer and Jesse Riddle, a Draper lawyer, is the first of many waves of such filings Lindberg's Sandy court can likely expect.

The suits are being filed under Utah's 14-month-old Unsolicited E-Mail Act, which provides for fines of $10 per unwanted e-mail up to a maximum of $25,000 per day. If the spate of new complaints is certified as a class action, potential damages could easily be in the multiple millions of dollars.

Source: The Salt Lake Tribune

Back to top

Europe

EU Takes Action on Growing E-mail spam

The European Commission, the executive arm of the 15-member European Union (EU), said in a statement, that a global effort is needed to fight the curse of spam, the junk e-mail that clogs up computer systems everywhere.

EU Commissioner, Erkki Liikanen, urged member states to apply a new law on spam, which will come into force from October. Under this new law, e-mail marketing will only be allowed with prior consent from the recipient.

Liikanen quoted industry figures showing around 48 percent of global e-mail traffic was spam and time wasted in clearing it out of inboxes cost firms $2.8 billion in productivity. Most of the nuisance mails were selling products, including financial services, 24 percent was pornography-related while six percent was fraud letters, such as a now well-known get-rich-quick scheme of mails purporting to be from Nigeria.

Source: Reuters

Germany Moves to Crack Down on Spam E-mail

The German government is moving to crack down on unwanted commercial e-mail known as "spam" and will submit an anti-spam bill to parliament later this year, Consumer Protection Minister Renate Kuenast confirmed.

According to Kuenast, the bill would make it an offence for spam e-mails to be sent to people without their prior consent and allow the authorities to take any profits made illegally by the practice.

Source: AFP

Back to top

Asia - Pacific

Australian Spam Gets the Chop

The Australian federal government intends to introduce legislation later this year that will ban unsolicited commercial e-mail, the minister for communications and information technology, senator Richard Alston announced recently.

The legislation is in response to a report by the National Office for the Information Economy, released in April this year, which advocated a multi-layered approach to Spam prevention.

The government stressed its commitment not to harm legitimate e-mail direct marketing as long as it was "in line with the requirements of the Privacy Act".

However, the Australian Direct Marketing Association (ADMA) is concerned that the legislation may adversely affect many local small and medium-sized businesses that use e-mail as a legitimate marketing tool.

The legislation would include a 120-day 'sunrise period' after it was enacted to allow businesses to ensure their practices were in line with its requirements.

Source: ZDNet Australia

Calls for Action to Ban Spam

SINGAPORE - Regulators in Singapore are reviewing a list of anti-spam measures while an overwhelming number of consumers in the United States favor legally banning spam or limiting it by law.

The Infocomm Development Authority (IDA) here is keeping a close watch on international developments in the arena, said The Business Times. It cited two surveys revealing 80 per cent of US consumers polled want spam to be banned or limited by law. About 60 per cent favor charging spammers in court under criminal prosecution laws.

Source: Borneo Bulletin

Back to top

International News

UPS Sends Legal Message to Spammers

United Parcel Service of America is tackling computer spam with a federal suit that seeks more than $1 million in damages from unnamed spammers.

In June, the Atlanta-based parcel delivery service sued individuals identified only as John Does 1-10, seeking an injunction that would bar them from transmitting e-mail messages that either purport to originate from UPS or use its trademark.

According to the suit, the spammers began sending thousands of unsolicited advertisements to UPS customers in March. The e-mails contained headers that made them appear to have originated from UPS or its employees, the suit claims.

The e-mails prompted hundreds of customer complaints "under the mistaken belief that the employees were responsible for sending spam e-mails," according to the suit.

Source: Law.com

Spam Annoyance Leveling Off

While Internet users are broadly in favor of legislation outlawing "mass spamming," more people are accepting spam as an everyday hassle, according to a new Harris Poll report.

In the last six months, support for legislation outlawing spam has gone up five percentage points, from 74 percent in December 2002, to 79 percent in May 2003.

On the other hand, the number of people who said that spam was 'very annoying' dropped significantly from last year. In 2003, 64 percent used that phrase to describe spam, a dramatic decline from the 80 percent in 2002.

On average, respondents said about 40 percent of the e-mails they receive per day are spam. Pornography remains the biggest annoyance, followed by mortgage and loan offers and pharmaceuticals. Interestingly, spam in some categories is not rated as that annoying. Fewer than half of respondents said spam for software and computer hardware annoyed them.

Source: Cyberatlas, TechWeb News

Back to top

Opinion

Opinions From Inspector Mails
Inspector Mails is the AI entity for Bigfoot's Anti-spam Solution. He will be giving regular updates on his opinions on current anti-spam trends.

Spam - The Result of Irresponsible E-mail Use

E-mail is a powerful and invaluable tool for business and for personal communication. Recent industry studies have shown that its use will become more deeply entrenched in the coming years.

The threat to e-mail, spam, which accompanied the maturity of this medium, has also grown dramatically. It is now the number one problem of e-mail users everywhere and is getting worse.

Spam is basically the result of the irresponsible use of e-mail. People started abusing it when they discovered that they could send thousands of messages with the same effort and expense it takes to send one. The staggering costs associated with e-mail abuse are real. They have been documented and quantified.

Varied approaches to controlling spam have been proposed and implemented. Education and legal measures are just some of them. However, for a solution to be truly effective, it has to be as dynamic as spam. The Bigfoot Anti-spam Solution is a very potent weapon against spam since it is able to respond rapidly to changes and new developments. With Bigfoot Anti-spam, e-mail users can again have full control over what they receive in their inboxes.

Back to top

Letters To The Editor

PORN Spam

It would be interesting to know some statistics about how much spam is porn- related. My guess is that it will be a significant percentage.

Phil

You guessed it right. The latest Harris poll shows that pornography is the biggest annoyance while other industry figures place it at 24% of total spam. Reference to these statistics can be found in the following articles in this issue: “EU Takes Action on Growing E-mail spam” and “spam Annoyance Leveling Off”.

SPOOFING

I receive roughly 15 spams per day that have a full name in the TO: line and often use names similar to the people I e-mail on a daily basis. There is no rhyme or reason to the subject, so my custom filters are virtually useless.

Betsy

What you have described is known as ”spoofing”. It’s the process of changing the name in an e-mail so that it looks like the e-mail came from somewhere or someone else. This is one technique used by spammers to avoid filters and is also the reason why your filters, which are based on past spam, will generally be ineffective. For more information on spoofing, please refer to the OPINION section of the April 2003 issue of the ASMR.

ANTI-spam COSTS

I am really interested in getting all this junk away from my PC. It should be against the law for any person/company to send this rubbish through the airwaves; some times it is upsetting to people like me and others. The price of anti-spam should come out of the account of the people who send it and then maybe they will stop sending this garbage to us all. In the meantime we have to stump up the price and it is dear enough to buy items for the PCs with out having to pay for a garbage remover.

Ella

A lot of people share the same sentiment about spam. Fortunately, technology companies, governments, and various groups are now working on solutions that hopefully will put a stop to spam and its perpetrators. You might find the article “Anti-spam Research Group Plans To Set New Internet Standards” published in the June 2003 issue particularly interesting. They are looking at the possibility of mandatory micro fines for unsolicited
e-mails, which is aimed at transferring the cost of mail transmission from the user to the spammer.

We appreciate all of the comments and overwhelming response we have received to the Anti-spam newsletter and we will be addressing your concerns in the next issue. You may send any comments regarding the newsletter to antispam.review@bigfoot.com. As we do reprint some of the comments of subscribers, if you prefer that your email address be withheld, simply advise Bigfoot and provide us a first name, city and state as an alternative.

Back to top


The following message was sent to you as a subscriber of Bigfoot.com. We will continue to bring you valuable offers on the products and services that interest you most. If you wish to unsubscribe, click here.

Editors Note
  Contents
International
News
  Opinion

• 

Letters to the
Editor
Feedback


 
The Anti-spam Monthly Review is a free opt-in public service newsletter focusing on anti-spam news and trends. We encourage you to use the news and information in this newsletter in taking an active stand in opposing spam.

The Anti-spam Monthly Review does not necessarily reflect the views of Bigfoot Communications or its officers. It is intended as a public service only.

Subscription to this newsletter is free but subscribers must request to receive a copy.

To subscribe, please click here.

For comments and questions, email us at antispam.review@
bigfoot.com
. Please include your name
job title and company.